论证分析写作AA-FODX
出处: OG

The following appeared as part of an article in a trade publication:

"Stronger laws are needed to protect new kinds of home-security systems from being copied and sold by imitators. With such protection, manufacturers will naturally invest in the development of new home-security products and production technologies. Without stronger laws, therefore, manufacturers will cut back on investment. From this will follow a corresponding decline not only in product quality and marketability, but also in production efficiency, and thus ultimately a loss of manufacturing jobs in the industry."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
报告错误题目

如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的

    暂时没有找到与本题相关的帖子

      您需要登录后才可以回复 登录 | 立即注册

      表情

      欢迎使用GMAT学习系统

      考点归纳 透彻解析   助你各个击破

      知识扩展 查漏补缺   让你每分必争

      考题收录 全面权威   助你攻城略地

      模考系统 界面真实   让你如临其境

      备考记录 轨迹清晰   助你倍数前进

      复习打卡 全球同步   让你知己知彼

      反馈建议